- Apple vs windows pros and cons 64 Bit#
- Apple vs windows pros and cons Pc#
- Apple vs windows pros and cons download#
- Apple vs windows pros and cons free#
- Apple vs windows pros and cons mac#
Excellent support and free migration to boot.
If your desire it to "not pay Microsoft," then look at Rackspace's Exchange hosting service. Why deal with the headache of managing something as vital as mail in an environment with so many single points of failure (one server, single electric source and likely little battery runtime, single Internet connection, etc). If so, then move your mail offsite to a hosting provider. You are looking to come out of the shadow of managing a Windows server. Now, that does not mean you need to host it your self (unless you have a regulatory or compliance requirement that demands this). While there is Kerio and Communigate, it is often just easier to stay in the integrated and largely compatible world of Exchange. I applaud your desire to cut spending and get away from the extortion that can be Microsoft. However, since the price is so low, my general reply is "buy two." This can be unsettling for some customers. But if you want RAID, you need to build it yourself. If you are keeping some, they are islands (in relation to centralized directory management). OS X can not act as a domain controller for Windows machines. Then see if OS X can excel at satisfying those requirements. Know and understand what your needs are first. Likewise, calendaring can be an adventure (getting better but still.). Plus, it is a single point of failure on your single most important feature. It is finicky, fragile, and lacking in features and customizations. I for one am very critical of Apple's built in Mail service.
Apple vs windows pros and cons mac#
The Mac server can provide file services, you can enable Apple Remote Desktop or screen sharing to remotely connect to your systems, and you can enable the profile manager to manage your iOS devices and even do the VPP managed distribution of Apps if desired. This is just like the Windows environment you are coming from. You become homogenous in your deployment and everything is under the same vendor. If your decision is to move all your Desktop/Laptops systems to Macs and you are already iOS heavy, then there is nothing better than also having a Mac Server in the environment. You base question is "Can a Mac mini Server replace my Windows 2003 server?" The answer is yes. Would I better giving more cash to Mr Gates ?Īny views and opinions gratefully received!
Apple vs windows pros and cons download#
Is it possible to transfer the outlook mail files across to it (or would this simply download itself once the mail accounts are set up ?) Given that our actual requirements for a server aren't particularly taxing - Windows Server Essentials 2012 + Exchange is quite a big investment to make, and we probably wouldn't use 25% of its intended capability.ĭoes anyone have any experience, of implementing OSX server for a small business - what are the downsides ?
Apple vs windows pros and cons Pc#
Replacement of the desk tops is a given with iMacs any way so doesn't come in to the equation, but it occurred to me that we could buy a Mac Mini to act as a server, and OSX server, for a fraction of the cost of Server 2012, a new PC to run it on, and Exchange Server. I tend to work remotely quite a lot, and at present use gotomypc to log in to my desktop from a remote pc or mac. We have only 3 PC's hooked in to the server and a variety of iPads and iPhones using exchange. Our server at the moment, acts as a central shared file server with a single Directory, which is accessed by the other PC's on the network and the server also handles our mail distribution, and syncs our iPads and iPhones to outlook. I've been looking at Windows Server 2012 Essentials - but note that this doesn't include Exchange to manage our mail - so we'd have to purchase this separately or use Office 365 - which we'd rather not have to do. We want to replace the ageing pc's with iMacs.
Apple vs windows pros and cons 64 Bit#
The hardware that Server 2003 is running on is only 32 bit - so to upgrade to Windows Server 2012, I'm automatically looking at having to buy a new 64 bit box. Since these were all acquired we've become Mac converts and I'm loathed to give Microsoft more money!Īs Server 2003 is coming to an end in terms of support, we've been looking at the options for a suitable replacement. We are a small business and currently have an ageing Windows Server 2003 set up - and some fairly old desk top pc's which are overdue for renewal, as they are running XP SP2. Hello All - I wonder if I could have your views and opinions on the following.įorgive me in advance, as I'm not very techie!
0 kommentar(er)
